Our Blog

Finding the right Executive Assistant to support a CEO is one of the most commercially significant hires any organisation can make.

Vacant critical roles bleed revenue and stall strategic projects. For hiring managers, the choice between engaging a specialist agency or relying on direct applications is not just about process - it is a calculation of commercial risk and speed to competency

Hiring an Executive Assistant based solely on technical skills often results in a 'management tax' where executives spend valuable time managing the person hired to save them time. This operational friction stems from a lack of emotional intelligence, not a lack of competence.

The "gig economy" logic is seductive, but when applied to high-stakes executive support, the hidden costs often outweigh the initial savings. You aren't just buying time; you are buying context, continuity, and the ability to prevent crises before they happen.

Understanding the mechanics of this talent migration is the only way to stop the drain and start competing effectively.

Hiring Directors are increasingly seeking HR professionals who act as genuine HR business partner to the C-suite, rather than simply processing paperwork. The difference between a strategic HR hire and a transactional HR one lies in their core focus: one drives commercial outcomes through people strategy; the other manages administrative compliance. Understanding this distinction is crucial for successful HR recruitment in London and boosting your internal capability insight.